I found this very interesting research article which quite easily explains the use of Bioresonance in the treatment of imbalance, more specifically, allergies in this case. Below is a summary of points which I hope are easy to follow. If you want to read the full paper please see the link below the article.
It is intuitive to understand how an interaction between a plant antigen and specific IgE can trigger the release of chemical mediators, including histamine, with clear phenomenological consequences: itching of the nasal mucosa, rhinopharynx, pharynx, and conjunctiva, sneezing, edematous congestion of the otorhinolaryngological districts with respiratory disorders, particularly critical are the edematous phenomena affecting the soft palate and the relaxed portions of the larynx, up to situations requiring surgical intervention (rhinosinusoidal polyposis).
A cytokine storm, which can precipitate anaphylactic shock occurs when a minuscule amount of allergens, in weight terms, such as hazelnut cream in a pastry or a limited number of cow’s milk protein molecules in dairy, is ingested.
Common treatments for allergies are: antihistamines, leukotriene inhibitors, corticosteroids, anti-receptor antibodies(omalizumab); specific desensitizing vaccine therapy.
Biophysical aspect of allergies
Without intending to give a lesson in physics, until the early 1900s the mass of any element was defined as a quantity tied to the weight of the element itself. However, in the early years of the century, discoveries made by numerous physicists of the time, many of whom were Nobel laureates, with Albert Einstein being a prime example, demonstrated that mass was a form of energy and that energy could be seen as a form of mass; this energy was represented as an electromagnetic wave whose distinguishing feature is its frequency (the number of oscillations per unit of time). The background to each theorization on the subject, but also of every therapeutic interaction, is supported by simple considerations. There is a correlation between a biophysical code and e molecular code, e fast experimentally confirmed by C. Smith , who evoked allergic phenomena by appropriate electromagnetic waves .
Under this law, all allergens can also be represented as an electromagnetic wave characterised by a distinct frequency specific to them. In light of the considerations made, the organs present in our body, including all our cells, can be represented by electromagnetic waves each with a specific frequency. The sum of all the signals emitted by our organs constitutes the electromagnetic spectrum of the human body, and this spectrum continuously varies over time.
Should there be multiple peaks within the frequency spectrum that do not vary over time, this should be interpreted as an indication of one or more pathologies, including that of allergy. For instance, by analysing the spectrum we can determine that at the frequency corresponding to the peak or peaks, there will be a specific allergen. Its intensity can be ascertained from the graph by evaluating the amplitude and the respective frequencies.
The biophysical therapy that is implemented involves connecting the patient, via specific electrodes, to an apparatus capable of generating and transmitting signals which, being in phase opposition, or inverted, can nullify the pathology’s peak or peaks.
If the human body behaved like a mathematical system, the reaction would be that: to a signal with frequency f1 and an intensity of, for example, “5”, if we were to send an opposing or inverted signal at the same frequency f1 with intensity “−5”, there would be cancellation of the signal itself. However, the human body does not behave in this way, so the result might be an improvement achieved through a reduction in amplitude to, for instance, “a4”, and we would need to continue therapy by sending a counter signal of “−4” and so on until the complete disappearance of the disturbance signal.
This approach must then be applied to the second peak at frequency f2 and so forth, in the event that other allergenic pathology peaks are present. It is necessary to treat the patient beginning with the peak having the greatest amplitude.
The Bioresonance system, which operates through the generation of inverted signals across various frequencies, is a secure system that does not produce any side effects, and consequently, it is applicable to all patients, regardless of age.
Materials and methods
Study Period: January 2023 to June 2023 Experimental Device: BICOM OPTIMA Twenty patients were recruited, including 2 children aged 4 to 12 years; 18 adults aged 18 and over. The patient population was affected by allergies to pollen, dust mites, and animal fur. Patient data were consistently collected before the commencement of each treatment session, which involved 3 to 10 sessions, with 2 follow-up sessions after 1 or 2 months. Each session was conducted at intervals of 7-10 days.
Analysis of results
The outcome of this study demonstrates that bioresonance therapy yields an initial amelioration of symptoms, a steady decrease in the use of antihistamine and corticosteroid medications, culminating in a resolution of the issue with significant enhancement of quality of life. No adverse effects were observed during the treatment. In particular, no initial worsening of symptoms was found, as a prelude to efficacy, as can instead found in patients undergoing thermal therapy for upper airway problems. The analogy between crenotherapy, structured in a scientific manner by Prof L. Pietrantoni, full professor of otolaryngology at the University of Milan, and our therapy is a cause for strong reflection, both are conveyed by water. From consolidated experience, we can state that the memory of our treatment remains in the patients checked in subsequent years. Our experience is that the rare cases of recurrence of symptoms in a periodic allergic rhinitis, on subsequent analysis, were due to the eclipsing capacity of the primary disturbance peak. Due to its size, this had disturbed the detection of further peaks, defined as phasic sub structures, located near the frequency scale.
We have never observed differences in response to treatments, between children and adults.
Conclusions
We believe that the application of bioresonance in disorders related to the hyperexpression of the TH2 system is highly appropriate. Considering that in this field, specific allergens are identified in only about 80% of cases when examined with epicutaneous (prick test) or blood tests (RAST), bioresonance allows for the detection and subsequent neutralization of the etiological element in urine. Such patients who often, but not always, respond to topically administered corticosteroids may require, due to the severity of the asthmatic symptoms and/or the recurrent presence of nasal polyps, the use of therapy with monoclonal antibodies . The competition with more sophisticated therapeutic methods is based not only on the absence of side effects but also on the intrinsic economic cost of the therapies.
We intend to conduct a subsequent study, supported by preliminary case series data, which will enable us to subject all those patients suffering from cytological chronic rhinitis, frequently associated with similar immune inflammation of the lower airways causing asthma, to bioresonance. These patients will be selected from those with symptoms indicative of allergy but negative specialist assessment; they will be accompanied by nasal cytology to confirm NARES, NARMA, or mixed forms of chronic cytological rhinitis as NARESMA, and by spirometry.
*Appeared in Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedical Science
Leave a comment